|
From the Archives : Anthony Jackson Gets Down
|
From The Spring 1990
Premiere Issue
Right from the start, we wanted Bass Player to cover all the basses—electric,
acoustic, rock, jazz, R&B, classical
… even vocal. (The Spring 1990 issue had
a profile of bass singer Richard Greene of
the Bobs). And when it came to pushing
the limits of expression, we couldn’t think
of anyone more important than Anthony
Jackson. Contributing Editor Chris Jisi—
who has probably written more articles
about bass and bass playing than anyone
else on the planet—set up an interview at
Jackson’s New York City apartment.
Armed with his tape recorder and a bunch
of 90-minute cassettes, Chris sat down
with Anthony and started asking questions.
Anthony answered at length,
drawing deeply on his knowledge of music
and fearlessly offering many strong opinions.
Hours went by. Chris ran out of
tapes, but Anthony pulled out some
more—“Keep going! I’ve got more to say!”
When it was over, Chris had more than
eight hours of recordings. It was a transcriber’s
nightmare but a mother lode of
great material. Chris shaped it into two
Q&A articles, which ran in the Spring and
Summer 1990 issues. In the first installment,
subtitled “Inspirations,” Anthony
explained why he had pioneered the 6-
string bass.
Chris Jisi: When did the idea for a contrabass
guitar occur to you?
Anthony Jackson: As a beginner, I
observed proper tuning sequence—
fourths—but often brought the entire
sequence down a half- or whole-step in
order to put certain important bass notes
in the lowest possible octave.… For one
reason or another, I decided I’d had
enough of this very unfortunate need to
compromise, and an idea that had been
hovering just outside of awareness popped
forward. The idea was a special instrument
with an extra string on the bottom
[and] the top. By the time I began traveling
extensively, in 1972, the 6-string
extended-range bass guitar had become,
for me, an inevitability.
Chris Jisi: There has been some criticism
leveled at the 6-string bass. Some players
call it a marketing gimmick while others
feel they should master the “standard” 4-
string before concerning themselves with
a six. Your thoughts?
Anthony Jackson: My feeling is: Why is four
the standard and not six? As the lowestpitched
member of the guitar family, the
instrument should have had six strings
from the beginning. The only reason it
had four was because Leo Fender was
thinking in application terms of an upright
bass, but he built it along guitar lines
because that was his training. The logical
conception for the bass guitar encompasses
six strings. As regards the issue of
“mastering the 4-string” before moving on
to the six, consider that inasmuch as there
is no point where one can be said to have
“mastered” anything, to make this inane
suggestion reveals the speakers to be idiots.
As long as we remain seekers, never truly
achieving our ultimate goals, we may as
well start with the basic blueprint and
enjoy the expanding expressive possibilities
of the extended range of the
instrument. Of course, the undoubtedly
famous-name superstars who utter this
nonsense probably regard themselves as
masters in their own right. So be it. For
the rest of us, their attitude reveals them
to be jealous, angry, and frustrated. Too
damn bad.
|